|
In
this essay, Tony Heyes reveals what for him makes a good novel, gay or
otherwise; and with a wry twist shows us just how relevant Jane Austen
still is to modern gay issues.
"A thoroughly
satisfying novel, whatever its subject matter, ought to be
equally as well-rounded. The “traditional” gay novel, if there is such
a thing, deals in a similar fashion with self-realisation and the
finding of a place in society. Coming out and coming of age are for the
gay person equivalent to the marriage market treated of by Jane Austen.
Each individual has to find him/herself and, despite any human
weaknesses and societal obstacles, find a place in society and in
relation to others. The need to be loved is and the search for love is
common to all humanity and the thoroughly satisfying gay novel
recognises that fact."
Some Day He’ll Come Along |
[Jane
Austen] even recognised the Christian Right when she saw it, putting
into
the mouth of Mr. Collins, a clergyman, the immortal words “You ought
certainly forgive them as a christian, but never admit them in your
sight, or allow their names to be mentioned in your hearing”. A
sentiment with which many a gay person will be familiar. |
Recently
the
BBC conducted a poll among its viewers to determine Britain’s one
hundred favourite books. To nobody’s surprise, one author had three
novels in the top ten. These were Pride
and Prejudice, Emma
and Persuasion, published in
1813, 1816 and 1818 respectively. Despite being nearly two hundred
years old, all six of Jane Austen’s novels remain in print, can be
found in any bookstore and sell steadily. Were she still alive she
would no doubt be as rich as Croesus.
Of themselves the novels are not remarkable in their subject matter. In
a letter to her niece written in 1814, advising her how to write a
novel, she speaks of collecting people together into 3 or 4
families in a country village and making full use of them while they
are so very favourably arranged. In another letter of 1816, written to
the Prince of Wales’ secretary who was urging her to write a historical
romance, she said that she was incapable of writing without laughing
and had no alternative but to keep to her own style, having on a
previous occasion protested that “I may boast myself to be, with all
possible Vanity, the most unlearned, & uninformed Female who ever
dared to be an Authoress”. Far from this being the case, she was an
acute and wise observer of life. She even recognised the Christian
Right when she saw it, putting into the mouth of Mr. Collins, a
clergyman, the immortal words “You ought certainly forgive them as a
christian, but never admit them in your sight, or allow their names to
be mentioned in your hearing”. A sentiment with which many a gay person
will be familiar.
Despite her modest aims and professions of ignorance, Miss Austen
clearly had the ability to write novels of enduring appeal. The three
novels to get into the top ten are all different from each other.
“Pride and Prejudice” is full of the exuberance of youth. “Emma” was
the work closest to her heart and is the most nearly perfect of her
works, achieving her stated aim of delineating the relationships
between 3 or 4 families and bringing them to a satisfactory resolution,
whilst “Persuasion”, written when she was dying (and my personal
favourite) is a story of hope abandoned and regained and has an elegiac
beauty seldom matched.
Although they have their differences, these novels have much in common
besides their beautiful prose and brilliantly ironic wit. Each is
concerned about making a happy marriage to someone with a good income
for, as the author said, a large income is the best recipe of happiness
(that irony again!). In each story the goal is attained only
after much misunderstanding, pride and prejudice and downright
stupidity. The main characters undergo humiliating revelations through
which they grow morally. They discover that nothing is as it seemed.
Only after many trials and false steps do the scales fall from their
eyes. Nuptial bliss is attained when they have thrown caution to the
wind and admitted their true feelings. Purged of their illusions they
take their place in society. The fascination of the stories lies
in the unravelling of the misunderstandings and the realisation by the
main characters of their true feelings. What more can anyone want
from a novel? Very little if the BBC poll is to be believed, and there
is no reason why it shouldn’t.
It can be argued that these novels are formulaic, that the ending is a
foregone conclusion. I would argue that they are formulaic only in the
sense that “He was born, he suffered, he died” is a summation of
anyone’s life. Each life, while conforming to this bleak description
consists of so much more; so do Miss Austen’s novels. Their attraction
lies in their truthfulness to life, their peeling away of illusions and
their emotionally satisfactory endings. Far from being formulaic, they
can be regarded as ideal types of universal significance. We never tire
of reading of rounded lives.
A thoroughly satisfying novel, whatever its subject matter, ought to be
equally as well-rounded. The “traditional” gay novel, if there is such
a thing, deals in a similar fashion with self-realisation and the
finding of a place in society. Coming out and coming of age are for the
gay person equivalent to the marriage market treated of by Jane Austen.
Each individual has to find him/herself and, despite any human
weaknesses and societal obstacles, find a place in society and in
relation to others. The need to be loved is and the search for love is
common to all humanity and the thoroughly satisfying gay novel
recognises that fact. So many tend to stray so far off the beaten track
that it is difficult to understand what the authors are about. Sex is
not the be all and end all for a gay person any more than it is for a
straight one, yet far too many “novels” suggest that predation is the
sole human motivating factor, particularly of the gay man. Other gay
novels, often very amusing, are set in what can only be described as
gay ghettoes. The straight world for them is, at the very least, an
irrelevance. Most gay people spend the greater part of their lives in
the straight world, come from fully-functioning straight families, have
straight friends and take their place in a predominantly heterosexual
environment. Though they have problems and self-delusions, particularly
in hostile communities, they too want to live happily ever after. Like
Jane Austen, the good gay author will contextualise his/her characters
within a real environment and deal with the problems inherent in being
obliged to function in a less than ideal world where all is not as one
would wish.
I hope publishers seek out more authors who are prepared to write
novels that give the rest of us hope and hold out the possibility of
fulfilling lives. Enough of hustling, despair and suicide. As Miss
Austen said “let other pens dwell on guilt and misery”!
|
|