Shattered Love
by Richard Chamberlain
Published by Regan Books ISBN 0-06-008743-9
I confess! Forty years ago I was a “Dr. Kildare” fan. I didn’t care
that Dr. Gillespie, played by Raymond Massey, was a sententious old
pain in the fundamentals, nor that the programme was horribly
manipulative with its emotive sound-track shoring up the acting, nor
that the moral of each episode had to be spelt out for us half-witted
viewers. No. I wanted to see Richard Chamberlain’s Dr. Kildare, so
clean-cut, as one critic said, that he might have been carved out of
toilet soap. Later I thrilled to his Ralph Touchett (if you’ll pardon
the expression) opposite Suzanne Neve’s Isabel Archer in the BBC’s
adaptation of Henry James’s “Portrait of a Lady”. I remained loyal
until “The Thornbirds” which, with its three tame kangaroos and the
smallest flock of sheep I’ve ever seen, not to mention its Baptist take
on Catholic ceremonial and appalling make up, was risible in the
extreme and destroyed forever my already shaky faith in Hollywood.
Thereafter I was a semi-detached fan, viewing his various swashbuckling
films when they were shown on the box but avoiding the commitment of
time that the many episodes of “Shogun” required.
Even so, I always retained a soft spot for the idol of my adolescence
and eagerly fell upon his recently published memoir. Wisely, Mr.
Chamberlain has not called his book an autobiography for it presents
only brief aspects of his life. He tells us that he approached his
publisher intending to write a book of “philosophical essays” (somewhat
different from those of traditional philosophers, it has to be said)
but the publisher said there was no market for those: an autobiography
would sell much better. However, what we have here is a number of what
Mr. Chamberlain regards as philosophical essays padded out with salient
episodes from his life. We are nudged into reading them by their being
sugared with tantalisingly brief selections from what must have been a
life crowded with incident. Mr. Chamberlain’s philosophy, it must be
said, obviously works for him but it is too personal and woolly to
engage the reader at any meaningful level. Navel-gazing is essentially
a private occupation.
This is a pity. When the facts of Mr. Chamberlain’s early life are
retold he describes situations and emotions to which, as Dr. Johnson
says, “every bosom returns an echo”. Growing up at a time when to admit
to being gay was to court personal ruin and maybe even imprisonment, it
was small wonder that he was deeply closeted and bewildered. Constantly
to be told that one is an unnatural abomination does nothing for one’s
self-esteem. To have a domineering alcoholic for a father, as he did,
adds to the feelings of worthlessness. It is strange that children grow
up craving the approval of those whose opinions they will later come to
see as not worth having. By then the damage is done. Clearly it is no
coincidence that so many gay people seek refuge in the performing arts
or in other professions in which they are able to adopt personae
different from their own and behind which they can hide.
Mr. Chamberlain for many years hid behind his public image. His journey
to personal acceptance and inner tranquillity was long and painful. The
scars remain. This is apparent from his memoirs. All autobiographies
can’t help but be selective but he is puzzlingly discriminative in what
he chooses to relate. Writing as an Englishman, I’m puzzled as to why
the possibility of an invitation from Princess Margaret which never
materialised is given so much space while other aspects of his four
years in this country go unrecorded. Who were his friends? What did he
do? Is he being reticent for reasons of tact? The same applies to
his life in the States. We are told very little of how his life has
been spent, other than in acting and therapy. Even his partner, Martin,
remains a shadowy figure. What attracted him? What keeps them together?
I suppose it is apparent by now that “Shattered Love” left me feeling
unsatisfied – not because it is bad but because it is tantalising in
its omissions. The author has a better story to tell and has led a much
richer life than he has described here. He is an engagingly modest
person and does not do himself justice. Were he to write a full
autobiography rather than a vehicle for his philosophical essays, I’m
sure I’d be his number one fan once again.
|
Paper Flowers
by Kit Fisher
Published by Wayward Books
(www.waywardbooks.com)
ISBN 1-903531-01-2
This book is
a real page-turner. Within a few pages the plot begins to unfold and
from then on the reader is hooked. It’s difficult to put the book down.
As the complications and misunderstandings multiply you want to know
what happens next.
Set in London in 1981, “Paper Flowers” begins as the tale of a rent
boy, Peter Duncan, and his client, Andrew Byrne. Theirs is ostensibly a
commercial relationship, a purely sexual transaction. However, not all
is as it seems. For a start, Duncan, a young man with a very troubled
past, has fallen in love with Byrne, who is his only client! Gradually
Byrne comes to return his affections but at first neither is prepared
to admit his feelings to the other or to himself. Matters are
complicated by their both having other agendas outside the relationship
that appear to put them on a collision course. Byrne is a special
policeman involved in undercover anti-corruption measures. Duncan is an
ex-policeman who was framed by the very people whom Byrne is
investigating and is engaged in his own clandestine investigations. He
is out for justice, not revenge.
As neither is aware of the other’s background or life outside the
bedroom, their fragile and tentative relationship shatters when their
paths cross in the criminal underworld and both their lives are
endangered. Will they be able to rebuild what little they had and go on
from there? As the narrative progresses the tension is ratcheted up a
notch at a time to the book’s cliff-hanging climax.
It would not be fair to give the impression that this novel is no more
than a rattling good yarn. Mr. Fisher handles the developing
relationship between the two main characters with great psychological
insight. Duncan’s conflicting emotions and, at times, lacerating anger
and despair are deftly described and totally believable. Byrne’s
growing realisation that Duncan is the most important person in his
life is also economically but truthfully presented. In addition to the
tension of the novel itself, a tension within the reader is also
generated – whether to race through the book to get to the denouement
or linger over the touching scenes as the relationship builds,
shatters, and builds again. The secondary characters, Byrne’s
non-judgemental superior, his colleagues and the villains are also
totally believable.
To anyone who wants a thoroughly satisfying and enjoyable read I would
say get this book. It can be obtained via the net at the address given
above. Enjoy!
|